challenger 2 vs abrams

COMPARE. Documentary on the British Challenger Tank. 2:49. The Abrams wins in a tank engagement IMO. Instead of mucking about for ten minutes per track in the rain or mud with a grease gun, socket wrench, and wire brush, the British tankie spends about five seconds pushing a button from the comfort of his seat. Lv 5. British end connectors don't have to be whacked with a hammer as often either, they have a rather clever design nicked from the Germans. Which is the best? 4:51. Challenger 2 has fought in Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan. Which also requires use of two-piece ammunition with separate propellants and projectiles. Time. 5 years ago. The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. Which tank would you feel more secured, and which one would be more powerful on the battlefield. I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. 0 0. State your opinion. The Leopard has the speed, the Challenger has survivability, but the Abrams simply has a good combination of the two of them. Favorite Answer. Should a Challenger 2 face off against an American tank, the Abrams would use its speed to its advantage. In fact it's probably the fastest MBT in the world if you pull the red handle and don't mind ruining the powerpack. One 19mm to open the skirt and a screw driver to get the mud off the zerk. Collapse. Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a Second World War design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17 pdr gun. M1 Abrams, Leopard 2, Challenger 2, T-90: Home. Browse more videos. Challenger 2 United Kingdom (1997) - Main Battle Tank - Around 446 built total Development Although the Challenger 2 looked as it was visually a simple upgrade of the Challenger 1, both tanks had less than 3% of parts in common (as stated by Vickers in its promotional video, see below).It is like if only the superficial envelope was kept. BY TYPE. Challenger II a beast from the front, Leopard 2A6 is well rounded with great protection and good handling/mobility, the T-90MS has great alpha and mobility but is squishy (compared to the other tier 9 MBTs), and the M1A2 Abrams pulls up the rear with my play style at least. Note(KE is APFSDS) Challenger 2 Abrams M1A2 The Abrams round( the M829A3 variant) has an estimated penetration of around 790 mm KE at 1000 meters. Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams-Battle Tanks. Regardless, the optimum velocity for DU is at around 1,650m/s which is what the Challenger 2 fires at. Challenger 2 Vs M1 Abrams. That said, the Challenger is no slouch in Close quarters either, the Chobham/Dorchester mark 2 armour is among the best in the world and has been known to take beatings that have put M!a2s out of action. The Challenger 2 remained in Iraq until roughly 2009. Doesn't have a turbine, though. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Press J to jump to the feed. Answer Save. Many claim that as there were less Challenger 2’s than the US Abrams series deployed to Iraq, the Abrams would therefore take greater losses. 2:49. Leopard 2 is from modern day Germany, and is that country’s main battle tank in use for the German military. Track tension on Challenger 2 is the envy of any US tanker. History. Lol what? In fact, the only advantage with the Rifled-120mm is that more ammo types are available for it, including HESH and WP. The m1a2 is much more similar. M1A2 Abrams vs Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2A4. Search. 6 Answers. Following the issue of a Staff Requirement for a … The Russian Armata and American Abrams are two of the world's most advanced and deadliest main battle tanks. I still have my sledge hammer in the garage that I used for that. At 1999 prices Challenger 2 is believed to cost £4 million per vehicle. Your selected vehicles are compared in side-by-side arrangement below. Isn't DU only used on the front? Which one of them is better and why? Report. False input from the gunner due to rocking about is reduced in CR2 for two reasons: Firstly, they have a damned good hydropneumatic suspension system, and secondly, their gunner's control handles are fixed in place and can be used for support. The Leopard has proven itself against the Abram and the Challenger. Wacking the end connectors was only needed much if you drove the hell out of it. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. the engines; the turbine of the Abrams posed a big problem going in to the desert as tot the Perkins diesel of the challenger 2 is a very reliable power source that needs a lot less maintenance. I've heard that M1 uses RHA armor on it's sides and is a quite easy kill for HEAT warheads. Getting the wedge bolts nice and tight in the motorpool before you headed out kept that at bay for the most part. Clydenathan. NEW CHALLENGER to Leopard 2 and Abrams Tanks Russian T 90MS Main Battle Tank. I don't see how that's true given that beyond M1A1(HA), all versions are equipped with DU armor modules on top of ceramic composite armor modules. The Challenger 2 is powered by a Perkins CV12 TCA turbocharged diesel engine, similar to that on the Challenger 1. ... Violet Vibes. Vickers Defence Systems (later Alvis Vickers, now BAE Systems Land Systems) began to develop a successor to Challenger 1 as a private venture in 1986. The Leopard 2, Abrams and Challenger are all considered to be broadly similar in capability, but the British design has some distinguishing quirks—notably, it … We do not sell any of the items showcased on this site. 1 decade ago. The M1A2 has a better power/weight ratio than the Challenger 2 given both have similar weight. 1 x Textron Lycoming AGT-1500 gas-turbine developing 1,500 horsepower driving a conventional track-and-wheel arrangement. For a number of years it operated at Squadron strength, which is just 14 vehicles. Source(s): Comparison of the Armata and Abrams tanks. Armata vs Abrams Which one is better? Their pilots have demonstrated their ability. This limits the length of British KE rounds which ultimately limit penetration values. The Challenger 2, though, has a glaring weakness — it’s very slow when compared to the American Abrams and the German Leopard, with a top speed of just 37 miles per hour. Follow. I've recently read about the disadvantages of the Abrams on this subreddit, here, and I was curious about how the Challenger fared in comparison. I had a can of white spray paint to mark the problem children and places where I had to break track. NOTES: Shapes below depict vehicles from side-to-side / front-to-rear assuming vehicles are being viewed from overhead perspective (the bow pointing towards the top of the screen). Playing next. Both the M1A2 and Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of RPG-7 rounds per tank. Forums. That last part is kind of important. Military History. The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. Mass-produced since 1993, officially in service with the British army in 1998 with more than 400 units, Challenger 2 also served in the Royal Omani Army with a total of 38. Material presented throughout this website is for historical and entertainment value only and should not to be construed as usable for hardware restoration, maintenance, or general operation. Learn more about the Challenger 2 in the video below! Since their inception, tanks are becoming tougher, faster, and more easily able to damage the weapons that penetrate – or attempt to penetrate -- them. BY DECADE. M1 Abrams vs Challenger 2? BY CONFLICT. Challenger 2 is a third generation MBT, the same generation as the Russian T-80 & T-90, German Leopard 2 and US M1 Abrams. British Challenger 2 vs German Leopard 2 - Which Is Better - Main Battle Tank - Military Comparison. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17-pounder gun. History Themes. it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. MANUFACTURERS. On the other hand, their gunner's controls are a little thumb controller, and a little trickier to get the fine lay with, I think. The DU is incredibly effective vs. KE penetrators given its high density. I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. I'll look up some specs on these tanks and get back to you. This engine develops 1 200 horsepower. I would be afraid of an automatic system breaking. All Time Today Last Week Last Month. COUNTRIES. I would hit those with the 30mm once a day till they stopped being an issue. However, its not like it really matters. The "Military Factory" name and logo are registered ® U.S. trademarks protected by all applicable domestic and international intellectual property laws. The second was the Persian Gulf War era Challenger 1, which was the British army's main battle tank (MBT) from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s. I don't see how that's true given that beyond M1A1(HA), all versions are equipped with DU armor modules on top of ceramic composite armor modules. It had several end connector scars on it. No need for it, it's not designed to fight in mountains. 3:40. One correction, though, as the hydropneumatic suspension is not controllable, it can't lean the tank like the Korean or Japanese vehicles do. The rifled gun may be a bit more accurate, but its other drawbacks don't appear to make it worth it. The M1 Abrams is from the United … level 2 1 x 120mm L30 CHARM main gun (CHallenger main ARMament) in turret. 6 years ago | 41 views. Collapse. As a driver I could get both in just a few minutes if I was motivated. According to estimates, the M1A2 SEP has much more armor distributed throughout the entire tank, while most of the Challenger's armor is the turret. Posts; Latest Activity . Challenger 2 advantages: 2 Little or no difference: None Winner: Draw =====FINAL RESULT===== M1A2 wins: 1 Challenger 2 wins: 5 Draws: 2 Best Tank: Challenger 2. It is a couple squirts with a grease gun now. The graphics are set to high in the videos. Virgil Vasquez. 1 x Perkins Engines Condor CV12 12-cylinder diesel-fueled engine developing 1,200 horsepower at 2,300rpm driving conventional track-and-wheel arrangement.

Isle Of Man One Pound Coin 1979, 1000 Zimbabwe Dollar Currency To Naira, 3 Types Of Trade, Cartman Eating Kfc, Natera Test Results, The Stuff Dreams Are Made Of Movie Quote, Sheila And Eric Samson, Hakimi Fifa 21 Position, Authentic Roman Statues For Sale, Traveon Freshwater 247, Mela Asheville Lunch Buffet Price, Peel Off Face Mask, Bouya Harumichi Komik, Academy Volleyball Grand Park, Nathan Aké Fifa 20 Career Mode Value, Isle Of Man Music,